The manufacturer of Vivint Solar has recently been named in a class-action lawsuit. Many homeowners who were injured due to falling debris or other injuries caused by falling debris say that Vivint didn’t do anything to try and prevent it from occurring. This is certainly one of the biggest issues with solar-powered systems. If there’s one thing that manufacturers should have done during the design phase of their product, it would be to make sure that their products were as safe as possible to use in construction projects. In many cases, manufacturers have refused to pay for injuries that occur because they didn’t make enough of an effort to protect their customers.

This particular company is also the defendant in a pending lawsuit in the state of Idaho, where the Attorney General is seeking a lawsuit against them due to their manufacturing defects. The complaint names both Vivint and their parent corporation, umenar Corporation. The complaint further claims that the parent corporation failed to “ensure that adequate measures” were taken to make sure that the products they manufactured” complied with federal and state safety and regulatory standards.” The complaint further claims that the “engulfing” of Vivint Solar in the merger agreement was designed to limit the liability of Vivint because of the merger agreement.

While this particular lawsuit may be isolated, there is a basis for these types of allegations throughout the solar energy industry. The problem is that many of these problems stem from a misunderstanding of what the warranty terms actually are. Essentially, there are two classifications of warranty: property damage only and non-property damage only. There are often disputes between the two classifications. This issue typically arises when a homeowner decides that they would prefer a property damage only warranty, but a non-property damage only warranty is listed in the contract.

Many homeowners mistakenly believe that their installer is an expert in this area and can provide them with an accurate understanding of the difference between the two types of warranties. The problem is that many homeowners don’t have any training in this field. The result – and the reason why this particular lawsuit is being brought by the state of Idaho – is that there are many homeowners attempting to understand the language of a commercial solar energy warranty, not a residential one. Even worse many solar systems sold today have no language on the warranties that will cover repair or replacement after the warranty expires. Many homeowners are caught off guard when this happens and end up in court with an installer who does not have the knowledge to address the issue.

In the past, many of these lawsuits have stemmed from issues with failed installation techniques. Many manufacturers, not including Vivint Solar, have been accused of ignoring or making false assurances about their product. In one instance, Vivint Solar was said to have told a customer that their solar panels would not require any more routine maintenance after they had been installed. It was also said that all that the homeowner would have to do is replace a single solar panel during his or her lifetime. This was not only untrue, but it was also found to be illegal in some states because of its language regarding warranties.

In this case, the complaint is being filed on behalf of a homeowner who has been a victim of this very scenario. He or she feels that the manufacturer of Vivint Solar knew about the improper performance of their products for months, yet they did nothing to correct the situation. To make matters even worse, after having the plaintiff’s attorney to file a Class Action Lawsuit against this manufacturer, Vivint finally responded with a “cease and desist” order. In other words, the manufacturer has asked that this individual’s lawsuit be immediately stopped so that they can explore the issue and determine what measures they plan on taking to correct their actions.

1 comment

  1. Please help, I am in the same situation with the Vivint Contracts. The solar seems to be so expensive, over $200 a month. There is no saving. If anything can still be done please contact me.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *